Find the best programs like Picasa for Windows. More than 20 alternatives to choose: FastStone Image Viewer, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, DigiKam and more. Mac and Mobile. Does Picasa spell the end for iPhoto? Today’s downloads for Windows, Mac and Mobile. Quick photo fixes with Picasa. I'm just switching from Windows to Mac. I got a Mac Mini and I thought that at least for photos it will be much better then PC. Now I have the problem. Microsoft Azure; Microsoft Dynamics 365; Microsoft 365. Sometimes you can encounter problems with screen sharing. Click the problem you're having below to find a solution. Ensure that you and the person you are sharing your screen with are using a version of Skype that supports screen sharing. Get the latest version of Skype. Skype for business screen sharing screen small. Problem: The “share screen” feature does not work at all Solution: Make sure that you are using the latest version of Skype that supports screen sharing. And it is also important that the other party is also using the latest Skype, or else it is pointless to try doing it. I have seen the same issue in a conference between Windows and Mac Skype for Business users. When the Windows user shares an app/window, the Mac user cannot see it. The Windows user has to share the entire desktop for it to work. While in a peer-to-peer session between a Windows Skype for Business client and a Mac Skype for Business client, and sharing is started by the Mac Skype for Business client, the Windows Skype for Business client will not be able to see the Mac user's desktop. Most of the business professionals has highly recommended Skype screen sharing for their business purposes, but on other end we see the problem of screen sharing not working properly. I have looked for some of the solutions to this problem of screen sharing. I'm trying to move this to iPhoto but its probably not possible at all. People who use only iPhoto from the beggining probably don't understand this. They think that it is like it should be. If you look at the list of functions, mayby iPhoto has more (this is what I thought). But to do something with iPhoto I need 10 times more time. I can't accept that after holiday I will spend 10 days putting them inside iPhoto (with picasa it takes 10 minutes). My only hope is that google will make iPhoto for mac. I completely agree with the above. ![]() I have some 14000 foto's, wich Picasa handle's with ease on my pentium M 1g notebook. On my Mac Mini with 1.25g (OSX 10.4) you cannot manage that amount of pictures. Even with iPhoto 6 it takes ages. Not to mention that iPhoto creates its own directory structure, wich completly ruins my own carefully built up structure. Because that is how I organise my picture's. Picasa leaves that all in tact. And since Google has introduced Picasaweb one can publish its own photo's on the web for FREE. It works like very, very easy! Don't get me wrong, i like the Mac but i don't like iPhoto. Best way to format drive for mac. I think Apple (or Google) has to come up with something way faster and that leave's my directory structure intact. (because thats how I organise my picture's) Strange because iTunes works the same on Pc and Mac. Same speed and ease of use. And (if you wich) leaves your directory structure intact. Mac Mini 1.25 OSX 10.4 JVC MP-XP731 notebook Amd homebrew Pc. I recently bought a Mac Mini with the Intel Core Duo. It sits next to my big Dell desktop at home - and I do almost everything on my Mac, except for City of Heroes (a game) and Picasa. I manage a huge pile of multimegabyte digital pictures and iPhoto wanted to duplicate all of my files turning my 'organized by folder' design into junk. Picasa doesn't do that and that's why I use Picasa on my Dell. I won't use iPhoto at all because it's super-aggressive and not really configurable to allow the behavior that I prefer, using folders to organize my photos. Even with iPhoto '06 and turning the option on for it to make aliases, once it got to my Paris pictures it just bogged down, making folders of thousands of aliases - why not just behave like Picasa? It just seems like way too much work to accomplish something rather simple. Anyhow, iPhoto is too slow, too un-configurable with an absurd amount of data duplication for the photos themselves and I would pay for Picasa, say $30. So far with the 'freeware' photo utilities I've seen for the Mac, many of them are cute to sort through stuff I save from the web - but not a single one is good enough to handle my collection of digital photos. Picasa, through my experience keeps all the originals in-place, and when you make edits, the edits are applied not to the image, but to a kind of 'stored workflow' so the next time you open Picasa and look at the file, Picasa applies all the edits you made to the photo again. You can only 'Save' changes made to a photo by exporting the photo to somewhere else. At first I wasn't sure exactly what it was doing until I looked at the file and saw how it was operating. I appreciate that level of security regarding my originals. ![]() Picasa, through my experience keeps all the originals in-place, and when you make edits, the edits are applied not to the image, but to a kind of 'stored workflow' so the next time you open Picasa and look at the file, Picasa applies all the edits you made to the photo again. You can only 'Save' changes made to a photo by exporting the photo to somewhere else. At first I wasn't sure exactly what it was doing until I looked at the file and saw how it was operating. I appreciate that level of security regarding my originals. Just some thoughts on earlier posts about iPhoto re-organizing people's image organization into junk - I agree that iPhoto should be more like iTunes in allowing you to add files to the library without necessarily adding it to it's own internally-maintained structure, but the reason why a lot of people love iPhoto is that it takes that level of maintenance out of the equation. I don't need to organize my photos myself, the software does it for you. If I add my images to its library, why would I need to keep a duplicate set in a completely different structure? IPhoto's goal is to take over the task of organizing your photos so you don't have to do it. Part of the simplicity of iPhoto is that it's not complicated, it's not infinitely-configurable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |